The Ethical Theories Of Aristotle And Immanuel Kant

This paper is meant to compare and contrast the ethical theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant. The moral philosophies of Kant and Aristotle are dissimilar in the rationale they suggest for moral conduct. Theorists suggest what they believe is a normative ethical approach, which should be utilized as a guide to determining moral conduct. Kant bases his opinions of morality completely on reason, while Aristotle treated the virtuous person as sensing good about being good. Kant and Aristotle share the opinion, that ordinary human reason is adequate for the explanation of a complete ethical approach and the course of human existence. God’s role in Kantian and Aristotelian ethics is restricted by what ordinary human ground may determine by its lights, and doesn’t depend on belief in divine exposure. In Aristotle’s case, he didn’t claim to have the advantage of any supernatural exposure, and in Kant’s, though he was in some vague meaning a Lutheran pietist, he believed the moral theory to be independent from the revealed parts of the religion. â€Å"The holy one of the Gospel has to first be contrasted with the model of moral excellence before one can distinguish him as holy,† Kant asserts (Kant, 1993, 50). Aristotle has the opinion, which Kant discards, that happiness is the initial standard of ethical theory and the normal criterion for the course of existence. Kant has the opinion, which Aristotle discards, tha t the idea of moral law is the fulcrum of ethical approach and theShow MoreRelatedPhilosophical Analysis of Aristotle883 Words   |  4 Pages Philosophical analysis of Aristotle Many theorists consider Aristotle to be the first person to use the term â€Å"ethics† in naming the field of study that had already been subject to develop by his predecessors Socrates and Plato. Philosophical ethics attempts in offering the rational response to the questions regarding how the human beings live. Aristotle used to be regarding politics and ethics as two related but very separate field of study because ethicsRead MoreSolving Ethical Dilemmas Essay1501 Words   |  7 Pages An ethical dilemma is defined as a complex situation that will often involve an apparent mental conflict between moral imperatives in which to obey one would result in transgressing another . When individuals are faced with an ethical question, we tend to search for a â€Å"correct answer† when responding. However, these types of questions do not always seem to have a straightforward answer. The arguments which may arise from an ethical dilemma question are typically examined in two w ays: whether peopleRead MoreThe Best Fit890 Words   |  4 PagesThe Best Fit Aristotle one of the best philosopher in the third century BCE explained what a virtuous act was and how we could get it. Immanuel Kant was one of the best philosophers in the 17th century, and created the Categorical Imperative, and John Stuart Mill was one of the best philosopher on the 18th century, and created The Utilitarianism ethical system, but which one made the best moral theory that best fits our culture and community? As we have seen in Chapter 7, ethics differs from cultureRead MoreComparing Aristotle And John Stuart Mill1130 Words   |  5 Pagesconcentrate of the famous works of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. After meticulously analyzing each of the above philosophers’ texts, I personally prefer the position of utilitarian and Benthamite, John Stuart Mill. After comparing and contrasting the positions and reasonings of these philosophers, I will demonstrate my own reasons why I have chosen John Stuart Mill as the most established in his theor y of the role of pleasure in morality. Aristotle was a particularly influentialRead MoreAristotle s Theory Of Virtue Ethics1095 Words   |  5 Pageswhole.† ― Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics Ethics is the philosophical study of moral judgements (Solomon: 2010). Moral philosophy has long been dominated by two basic theories; deontology, inspired by Immanuel Kant, the eighteenth century philosopher and; utilitarianism or consequentialism, which derives its modern day instructions from eighteenth and nineteenth century philosophers Jeremey Bentham and J. S. Mills, respectively (Hursthouse:1999). Increasing dissatisfaction with these theories and theirRead MoreAristotle And Kant : Virtue Ethics1847 Words   |  8 PagesAristotle and Kant are great philosophers who have made substantial efforts to focus on the issue of virtue ethics. Virtue ethics is a wide term for principles that focus on the moral act that brings about good values. Aristotle and Kant are virtue ethicist since they attempt to offer moral advice to the society. Most virtue ethicist emulates Aristotle who affirmed that a righteous person should have the ideal traits. These traits originate from natural inner most tendencies but societies need toRead MoreImmanuel Kant s Moral Philosophy2217 Words   |  9 Pagesphilosophers have set out on a mission to identify the best method to determine the most morally correct action. Who was Immanuel Kant? Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is one of the most influential philosophers, renowned for his contribution to various branches of philosophy, including metaphysics, epistemology, aesthetics, and ethics. In relation to the most morally ‘correct’ philosophy, Kant was a vigorous advocate of deontology. He was a firm believer that reason (rational thinking) is the source of moralityRead MoreComparing The Theories Of Aristotle And Kants Theory Of Ethics884 Words   |  4 PagesIn this paper, I will compare the theories of Aristotle and Kant on the basis of ethics. I will be examining Aristotle’s theory of virtue in which his focus is â€Å"What is a Good Life† and Kant’s theory of deontological ethics in which the moral worth of an action lies in the duty upon which moral actions are engendered. To begin, Aristotles moral theory (theory of virtue) focuses on questions about what is good? His focus is What is the good life? What does it mean to be a good person? (KemerlingRead MoreThe Ethical Theory Of Ethics1958 Words   |  8 PagesEthics is the code of conduct that is widely known in this society. The ethical theory of Aristotle states that the good moral of human beings is as a result of the rational reasoning of human beings over what is wrong or right. He argued that whatever is thought to be good has to be applied to everywhere. On the other side of the story, Immanuel Kant’s ethical theory states that the individual’s ethical morals are the result of the combination of the ability to reason rationally and the presenceRead MoreWhat Makes A Right Act Right And Wrong Act Wrong?1444 Words   |  6 Pagesand wrong if it violates the natural law. I will defend Aquinas view by talking about how Aquinas came up with his idea, what Aquinas means by natural law, and backing up Aquinas theory by using Kant and Aristotle theories. Overall, Aquinas was a unique philosopher because he studied the works Immanuel Kant and Aristotle views of right and wrong acts. Kant’s view stated if an act is right it is done from duty and wrong if it violates the categorical imperative. A categorical imperative is â€Å"a unconditional